• Stocking Fillers
  • Latest Issues
  • Reviews
  • Tutorials
    • Microphones
    • On The Bench
    • Thinking Outside the Box
    • View From The Bench
  • Features
    • Acoustics
    • Broadcast
    • DIY
    • Field Recording
    • Game Sound
    • Interview
    • Live Sound
    • Mastering
    • Mix Masters
    • Music Business
    • Name Behind the Name
    • Post Production
    • Quick Mix
    • Recording
    • Studio Focus
    • Technical
  • Podcast
  • Free Stuff
  • By Gear
    • Audio Accesories
    • Audio Mixers
    • Headphones + IEM
    • Interfaces
    • Location Sound
    • Microphones
    • MIDI Controllers
    • Mobile/iOS
    • PA Systems
    • Software + Plug-ins
    • Studio Monitoring
    • Studio Outboard
    • Synthesizers + Keyboards
  • By Interest
    • Acoustics
    • Broadcast
    • DIY
    • Field Recording
    • Game Sound
    • Live Sound
    • Mastering
    • Music Business
    • Name Behind the Name
    • Post Production
    • Quick Mix
    • Recording
    • Technical
    • Thinking Outside the Box
  • By Brand
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
Previous
Issues 61
3 SHARE
Read Next: Technics Relaunches in Australia
  • Home
  • /
  • Feature
  • /
  • Recording
  • /
  • Remixing Abbey Road: 50th Anniversary Edition

Remixing Abbey Road: 50th Anniversary Edition

When it came time to make the 50th Anniversary remixes of The Beatles’ classic Abbey Road, producer Giles Martin and engineer Sam Okell were tasked with carrying the weight of its history over the lines.

By Paul Tingen

18 November 2019

The heritage rock industry is dominated by ‘boxed set’ re-releases of iconic rock albums from the ‘60s and ‘70s, with all manner of enticing add-ons thrown in: session outtakes, previously unreleased live tracks, original tracks remastered, sometimes remixed and sometimes even enhanced with new overdubs. Of course, it all comes packaged with spectacular artwork, hitherto unseen photos, new essays, interviews and more. There have been boxed sets by Bob Dylan, Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, The Beach Boys and many more. The Beatles have joined the melee but their boxed sets have become more controversial than most because their albums have achieved iconic status; making any changes brings to mind the proverb about repainting the Sistine Chapel.

Here we are in 2019 with three massive boxed sets to date, marking the 50th anniversaries of Sgt. Pepper’s (2017), The White Album (2018), and Abbey Road (2019) respectively. Great packaging and session outtakes are par for the course, of course. The controversial bit is that repainting has indeed taken place, in the form of remixing the original album tracks in Pro Tools. Screams of ‘sacrilege’ have been muted, however. Reactions from fans and critics alike have been overwhelmingly positive and this obviously has to do with the quality of the remixes, which were conducted by producer Giles Martin (son of George Martin) and engineer Sam Okell.

SERGEANT PEPPER’S…

Following the release of the Anniversary Edition of Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band in May 2017, Giles Martin explained that the impetus for the remixes came in 2015 when he and Okell were invited by the remaining Beatles to make 5.1 remixes of the tracks on the 1 album (a compilation of The Beatle’s number one hits) that had music videos. In the process, Martin and Okell also did stereo remixes that were received with all-round applause. This, said Martin, “gave us the confidence that we could successfully remix Sgt. Pepper’s.”

There were additional justifications for the remix of Sgt. Pepper’s, explained Martin. “With Sgt. Pepper’s, the band was far more focused on the mono version. The team spent three weeks mixing to mono, which was done with the band present, and only three days mixing the stereo version – and the band was not even there! If you compare the mono and the stereo versions, they are very different. John Lennon once said that you hadn’t properly heard the album unless you heard the mono version. Plus, the original stereo mixes have some major flaws, like songs being played back at the wrong speed. So we decided to create new stereo mixes, using the mono mixes as our template. We felt that we could create the stereo mixes the band would have wanted 50 years ago, while also trying to break some new ground by improving the mixes for modern ears.”

Furthermore, Sgt. Pepper’s was recorded on a four-track tape recorder with producer George Martin and engineer Geoff Emerick regularly bouncing to new generations of tapes. With the first generations of tapes still available, Martin and Okell could go back and load first generation material into Pro Tools, thereby not only improving sound quality but also providing the ability to separate parts that had been previously bounced together out of necessity.

Sam Okell

THE WHITE ALBUM…

Some good justifications were given for remixing Sgt. Pepper’s. One wonders what justifications Giles and Okell had for remixing The White Album, and how they compare with remixing Sgt. Pepper’s.

“Some of the songs on The White Album were recorded on a four-track Studer J37, others on an eight-track Studer 3M” replies Okell. “But there were far fewer overdubs on that album, so there were fewer bounces, which made the whole process easier than Sgt. Pepper’s. It was mixed in stereo and mono, but the differences between those mixes were not as pronounced as they were with Sgt. Pepper’s.”

“The thing about The White Album is that the tracks are all so different. It’s far less of a production album than Sgt. Pepper’s, or Abbey Road for that matter. The concept of remixing Sgt. Pepper’s was neat and valid and easy to explain, but with The White Album it was a song-by-song thing. We were just trying to keep the character of each song, with the entire album being a collection of them.”

ABBEY ROAD

In contrast to Sgt. Pepper’s and The White Album, Abbey Road was the first Beatles album that was recorded entirely on eight-track, and for which no mono mixes were done. Moreover, the recordings, the production, and the stereo mixes were top class, making the album sound almost like a modern record. Of the three anniversary editions, the notion of remixing Abbey Road would have to come the closest to the notion of repainting the Sistine Chapel and raises the question: why?

“The original album does sound great,” agrees Okell. “The stereo positioning is pretty modern, with most lead vocals in the centre, for example, and there were no major technical issues that needed fixing. After we had remixed Sgt. Pepper’s and The White Album, Apple Records [the Beatle’s record label] was indeed concerned about whether it would be worthwhile remixing Abbey Road. So Giles and I had a go to see what would happen, and whether it was justified. We ended up making changes that are far more subtle than those that you hear on Sgt. Pepper’s, but we felt that they were valid. There are many subtle changes in the balances and positioning, and we expanded on many of the mono sources that are hard panned and hard positioned, in order to try to create a more cohesive stereo image.”

We had some mix notes, but for the most part we had to recreate the original mixes using our ears.

MIXING ‘HERE COMES THE SUN’

According to Okell, ‘Here Comes The Sun’ used the 13th take from the original tapes and consisted of a bass track , a drum/percussion track, two acoustic guitar tracks, a combined electric guitar/drum overdub track, a lead vocal track, and two backing vocal tracks – one shared with guitar overdubs, the other shared with claps. In the Pro Tools session the titles of the tracks taken from this first tape begin with HCTS_T13, meaning Here ‘Comes The Sun Take 13’. During the recording process in 1969, this material was submixed to a second eight-track tape to which strings, Moog synth, woodwinds, and backing vocals were overdubbed – the titles of the tracks from the second tape begin with ‘HCTS_T15’.

At the top of the HCTS session are a bunch of reference tracks, explains Okell. “The first one is a copy of the stereo remaster we did in 2009 for syncing purposes, as explained earlier. Below that is the original CD. Next are two transfers of the original mix master tapes from 1969, one with the tape recorder lined up with the CCIR test tape and the other with the MRL test tape. Further down are two of our mix prints. The three tracks below that are prints from a second generation tape that turned out to be copies from the first generation tape, so we did not use them.”

“02 Percussion is the main mono drum track. I was trying different techniques to try to get some spaciousness on the drums, so we did real ADT using two tape recorders [as described in the main text], but we decided not to use that. Instead I copied the drum track to another track, and cut that up, edited it very strongly, and nudged the clips in time to get a kind of ADT effect that’s called Percussion DT (double track) in the comments. We panned the original drum track 65% right and the DT track 54% to the left, to create the impression of a stereo drum track. The DT track also was a little less loud, and I used the FabFilter Pro-Q2 to cut out some mid-range. These two tracks go to the Drums Bus, with has several plugins. K is the Waves Kramer Master Tape, which I like to use for subtle tape compression, 2 is the Pro-Q2 for a little bit of EQ, U is the Kush Audio UBK1 compressor, and R is the Waves RBass, which adds some 70Hz thump to the kick. These are all subtle tweaks that we thought made the drums sound better and sit well in the track.”

“Next down is the bass guitar track, on which we have the Waves Redd 37/51 Channel Strip, adding some low frequencies. It’s part of Waves’ Abbey Road series, and I like the sound of many of these plugins. They obviously often are appropriate for a project like this. For more detailed EQ, like precise notches, I tend to use the FabFilter Pro-Q2 and Pro-Q3.”

“There are two original acoustic guitar tracks; they had been bounced together on the second-generation tape the song was mixed from, but because we could go back to the first-generation tape we were able to get them as separate tracks again. They both have the FabFilter Pro-Q2. Then we added the ADT effect to each guitar track, this time done with tape recorders, and printed the ADT tracks back in. We again panned the original track and the ADT track slightly differently to create a bit of space. Those guitars were a bit disjointed when panned left and right, and we felt they sounded better when they were panned closer together and made one sound. The original track starts with the guitars hard left and then the Moog sound pans across and George’s vocal comes in on the right. It’s a cool effect. We mimicked some of that with the acoustic guitar starting left, and then the Moog pans across and, once the drums kick in, we pan the acoustics more to the middle. We placed George’s vocal in the centre, because we felt that worked better. It obviously sounds far more modern.”

Abbey Road Studio’s Reverb Plates plugin.
“All four acoustic guitar tracks go to the Acoustic Guitar Bus, which has the Pro-Q2, the Kramer Tape plugin again, the Kramer Pie compressor, the REDD 37/51 Channel Strip, and a tiny bit of Waves RCompressor, just holding down the peaks. All plugins do very subtle processing. There’s also a send to a plate reverb aux at the bottom of the session, with the Abbey Road Reverb Plates plugin trying to re-create the plates they had at the time.”

“Below the acoustic guitars is the strings track, copied from the second eight-track tape. The strings are also in mono, and, just like with the drums, I made a copy of that track, cut it up and very subtly repositioned the clips to create a fake ADT effect to give it more of a stereo spread. These two string tracks go to the Strings Bus, which has again the REDD 37/51, Kramer Tape and the Pro-Q2.”

“Underneath the strings is a combined electric guitar and drums track that is another overdub. The drums were just some snare hits, and I again did ADT on these to give them more width. Below that overdub is the Moog and woodwind overdub, and I automated panning to move that around. I also created another ADT copy; I cut out two bits of the Moog and pasted them on two separate tracks, on which I used the Waves J37 Tape plugin to create an ADT-like wobble. The next two tracks below that are backing vocal, guitar and clap overdubs, from two tracks on the second tape. We did not use any of this other than the claps in the middle of the song.”

“George’s lead vocal is from the primary tape, Take 13, and the edits we did on that are mainly for clip gain, to adjust the volume, and I may have done some manual de-essing using volume automation. The main vocal is a bit fuller and louder than in the original mixes, which we thought sounded better. There’s a bit of processing on the inserts with the Pro-Q2, the UAD 1176 compressor and the Waves RDeEsser. There’s also a send to the ‘vox adt spread’ track below it, which has the Waves ADT plugin on it. It adds a bit of width to the vocal, because it is so hard centre. I did a tape ADT (LV adt), but we didn’t like that as much, so we muted the clip. There are two backing vocal tracks, and we applied tape ADT for both of them, and all vocal tracks went to the Vox Bus, which has again the Pro-Q2, the J37 with a bit of mastering type tape compression, the REDD 37/51, the Kramer Pie and some RDeEsser to knock out some 6kHz from the backing vocals. There’s also a send to the Abbey Road Plate Reverb aux, on which I also have the Pro-Q2 and the Kramer Pie, compressing the reverb.”

Click to see full session
Click to see full session

TRANSFERRING ABBEY ROAD

As with the other albums, the first step of the remixing process for Abbey Road was to transfer all the original analogue tapes to Pro Tools. “All tapes were running at 15ips, which means each tape can contain about 28 minutes of material,” explains Okell. “Each tape has successions of different takes including the initial takes, the take that was used for the final mix, and numerous overdubs and bounces. We also had two different test tapes — CCIR and MRL — to align the tape machines; one sounding slightly brighter than the other. So we did numerous transfers from each tape. The first transfers were of the entire tapes, which gave us all the bounces, alternative takes and so on to refer to and perhaps even use – allowing us to go back a generation or two as we did with Sgt. Pepper’s and The White Album.”

The next transfers were a little more complicated, as Okell explains: “The speed those old tape machines run at depends on the fluctuating voltage of their power supplies; one day they would run a tiny bit faster or slower than another day. These were tiny fluctuations, not like with Sgt. Pepper’s where there were sometimes differences of a semitone. For speed references we decided to use the earlier 2009 remasters of Abbey Road, that I’d been involved in making, because our idea for the 50th anniversary version was the same as our idea for the 2009 version: we wanted to get as close as possible to what it sounded like at the time in terms of speed and pitch. So for these transfers we created a Pro Tools session for each song, and at the top of that session we loaded in the 2009 stereo remaster of that song as a sync reference. Then we’d go through the original tapes, find the take that the final mix for that song was built from, and transfer that into the session in sync with the 2009 remaster.”

“Because Abbey Road was all recorded on eight-track they were able to do a lot of bouncing of tracks internally on to that one tape. In many cases they then deleted the original tracks to make room for more tracks, which meant that we could not go back a generation. In some cases they worked with two eight-track recorders, or a combination of an eight-track and a four-track recorder, bouncing from one tape to another, and those tapes did enable us to go back a generation to get separate tracks, like we did with Sgt. Pepper’s.”

Above: REDD desk. Right: FabFilter ProQ2 as used to remove harshness from John Lennon’s vocal on ‘Oh Darling’.

REMIXING ABBEY ROAD

After all the tapes were transferred into Pro Tools, Giles and Okell tried to approximate the original mix of each song as closely as possible in terms of levels, panning, EQ, compression, delays, reverbs and other effects. This involved many hours of close listening and comparing. When they did the Sgt. Pepper’s remixes they used a lot of the same outboard gear that was used for the original mixes, including the classic REDD valve mixer that was used at the time, along with some some choice plugins. According to Okell, things were different for the Abbey Road remixes.

“We had some mix notes, but for the most part we had to recreate the original mixes using our ears. We did the Abbey Road mixes in-the-box, and treatments tended to be more plugin-based than analogue-based because we were not looking for a lot of extreme processing. We often used plugin approximations of vintage gear. What we had with this album were good sounding recordings; when we simply played back the basic sessions we got a pretty good representation of the final mix. So what we had to do for Abbey Road was more subtle than Sgt. Pepper’s or The White Album: how can we improve the tonal qualities of some of the sounds, and how can we improve the stereo sound stage? These subtle changes could, for the most part, be achieved by using plugins.”

Two years earlier, when remixing Sgt. Pepper’s, Martin and Okell relied heavily on vintage goodies like EMI’s RS124 compressor and RS127 Brilliance Control, Fairchild’s 660 compressor, EMT’s 140 plate, and the studio’s REDD desk. They also used a process called ADT (Artificial Double Tracking) – a technique devised by Abbey Road engineer Ken Townsend that involved two tape recorders playing back two identical signals, with the varispeed of one of them used to vary the playback speed by a few milliseconds to create a phasing or ‘wobble’ effect (depending on how much varispeed is applied). For the Abbey Road remixes the only hardware Giles and Okell used were an EMT 140 plate, the tape recorders required to recreate the ADT effect, and the REDD desk – the latter because the original Abbey Road sound engineer, Geoff Emerick, felt that the transistorized TG12345 desk had a less punchy sound, contributing to a “kinder, gentler” feel.

According to Okell, “Geoff has said that he couldn’t get quite the same sound with the TG desk as with the REDD desk. The TG is a very good desk; it’s cleaner, but it does not overdrive in the same way as the REDD desk does. The REDD also has a different approach to EQ, with just a high shelf and a low shelf, and you tend to max these out and get this big ‘smiley face’ EQ curve. So for many of the songs on Abbey Road we ran individual parts through the REDD desk, sometimes EQing and sometimes overdriving them to different degrees to get some of that character that might have been missing in the original mixes of Abbey Road due to being mixed through the TG. That was quite effective.”

“On Sgt. Pepper’s they were into using the ADT for the phasing effect, most famously on John’s vocal in ‘Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds.’ For Abbey Road they were more in love with the wobble effect, for example on the Moog synth sounds. There is no real plugin equivalent for ADT. There’s Waves’ Reel ADT plug-in, which is fine for when you want a general phasey sound but it is too much of a sledgehammer if you want to do very detailed stuff, such as vary a very small amount of delay. If you do ADT with analogue tape machines you can control it as you print it, and if something does not sound right you can go back and do it again. It’s amazing that the tools they had at the time, apart from EQ and compression, were all tape-based – from simple tape delays to the psychedelic comb filtering effect that you get with very close ADT.”

“Vocals were an important part of our focus during all of these remixes. The lead vocal for ‘Here Comes The Sun’ is fuller and louder than in the original, and we think it sounded better. We did the same thing on ‘Something,’ pushing the lead vocal to be decidedly louder – it seemed oddly quiet on the original. And on ‘Oh Darling’ we did quite a bit of work with FabFilter’s ProQ to make Lennon’s lead vocal less harsh. It makes the song more attractive.“

“All mixes for all the songs were sent to the Stereo Process aux, which is the master track. The signal chain was Waves Redd 37/51, UAD Chandler Abbey Road Curve Bender Mastering EQ, a Kush Audio UBK1, FabFilter Pro-Q2, Waves SSL Bus compressor, Waves Abbey Road TG12345 channel strip, UAD Studer A800 emulation and a UAD Fairchild 660, with the settings tweaked per song. I printed each mix at the top of the session and sent it to Miles Showell, who mastered the album with Giles present. We weren’t too bothered about the mixes needing to be loud in general, or being louder than the 2009 master. When you compare our remixes to any contemporary stuff, they are way quieter. It is not about loudness!”

Instead, as Giles Martin had noted earlier, the remixes were about “improving the mixes for modern ears.” Whether any of the “trying to break some new ground” approaches taken on the Abbey Road remixes will meet with universal approval, or finally have the purists up in arms about ‘repainting the Sistine Chapel’, will be clear by the time you read this…

MIXING ‘COME TOGETHER’

As with ‘Here Comes The Sun’, the mix session for ‘Come Together’ has reference tracks at the top, starting with the 2009 CD remaster, a copy of the original CD, and two transfers of the original stereo mix, one using CCIR, the other MRL tape aligning. Below that are five prints of Martin and Okell’s mixes. Below these are four greyed-out tracks from a tape that was not used. The main interest in the new mix of ‘Come Together’ lies in the way they made the drums more stereo, as Okell explains.

“The first active drum track, with simply ‘Drums’ in the comments box, is cut out in some sections. In the main riff section where Ringo is doing that hi-hat/tom fill pattern, we cut out the hi-hat and each tom individually, copied them to their own tracks, panned them to slightly different positions, and EQ’d them slightly differently. The original drum track is mono and panned to the right, and we wanted to add some stereo movement to that hi-hat/tom fill. That song is all about the riff, and the way the instruments sit together is crucial to it working. The experiment with the tom fill is just one way in which we were trying to change things a little bit. We also isolated the cymbal rings and placed them in a different position. We tried to be subtle, because if we did these things too extreme it just sounded hokey and gimmicky. All drums tracks go to a Drums Bus on which I have similar plugins on the inserts as with ‘Here Comes The Sun,’ though the send is to a chamber reverb from the Waves Abbey Road Chambers Reverbs plugin.”

Okell continues, giving a few more highlights of the ‘Come Together’ mix. “I tried ADT on the bass but didn’t use it, but I did use ADT on parts of the electric guitar below that. There are three greyed out tracks from a transfer we had done back in 2009; we were interested in hearing whether that sounded better. but didn’t use it.”

“The track with ‘Vocal’ in the comments box is the main vocal. It is panned to the left in some instrumental sections, where the noises that John is making are also doubled in the harmony tracks, which we panned right in those sections. There’s a Pro-Q2 EQ that’s automated to take out some harsh mid frequencies in that vocal, just trying to tame it a little bit. The vocal is maybe a tiny bit less harsh and a little bit fuller than in the original, but it’s not a radical change. All vocals went to the ‘LV BUS’, and you can see that I was experimenting with what to use – sometimes using the Waves J37, sometimes not. The ‘LV BUS’ plugins are J37, Q2, Kramer Pie and Q3.”

“There is an electric piano track and its ADT is called ‘wurly adt’, and a guitar/maracas track, again with an ADT double. The guitar is panned hard right when the maracas come in, which is during the wurly solo, and when the lead guitar comes in, it jumps to the centre. That is what we thought worked best. Gtr2 is similar, it is like it is another take. So we have a double tracked guitar and maracas. They are panned pretty wide when the maracas play, and then they come into the centre when the guitars play that riff.”

RESPONSES

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Dave Weir says:
    4 December 2019 at 10:10 pm

    Er … pretty sure Paul McCartney sang (and wrote) “Oh Darling”. It’s the stuff of recording legends after all. Him coming into the studio for days on end to try to nail that vocal. He walked in apparently, as he lived nearby.

    Reply
    1. Graeme Woller says:
      6 December 2019 at 6:25 pm

      Quite right. Lennon is quoted as saying he wished Paul had let him sing it because he thought he’d have done a good job.

      Reply
  2. Graeme Woller says:
    6 December 2019 at 6:24 pm

    I’m def. not a hater of these projects, I love the original versions, the remasters, all of it really. It’s not like the older masters are going away. But man these remixes over the last couple of years feel like they’ve been done with a LOT of love, care and bravery. I’ve enjoyed every second, and I can’t wait to see what they work on next!!

    Reply

More for you

Filter by
Post Page
Feature Recording Tutorials Studio Monitors Mastering Neumann News Software + Plug-ins Plug-ins Waves PMC Regulars Issue 72 Session Notes Reviews Korg Interview Mix Masters Native Instruments
Sort by

In Deep With a Classic: Remixing Deep Purple

19

Remixing Wonderland

19

Mixing for Dolby Atmos Using Neumann Studio Monitors

10

Waves Clarity Vx DeReverb & Pro

10

Miles in Atmos

10

Session Notes: ‘Shape Of You’ Remix (2017)

10

Flood & Fire in the Studio

10

Korg Wavestate

10

The Creative Use of Tape

10

Mix Masters: Bieber’s Despacito

10

How to Remix a Song Better than the Original

10

NATIVE INSTRUMENTS ACQUIRES META-POP

10

preview
preview

Free! Get AudioTechnology magazine sent straight to your inbox every month



preview
  • Stocking Fillers
  • Latest Issues
  • Reviews
  • Tutorials
  • Features
  • Podcast
  • Free Stuff
  • By Gear
  • By Interest
  • By Brand
© 2024 AudioTechnology magazine.